Cutral Có in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Cutral Co in context

1.21.622.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.21.622.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Cutral CoNeuquen (Region)Argentina (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Cutral Có plotted against Neuquén and Argentina. The SNDi of new construction in Cutral Có followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease, compared to Neuquén which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and Argentina which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Cutral Có's incremental SNDi fell from 1.32 to 1.25 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Cutral Có ranked 1st out of 2 cities in Neuquén and 25th out of 77 in Argentina as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
1.25
Rank in Argentina
4th of 77
Rank in Neuquén
1st of 2

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
1.34
Rank in Argentina
25th of 77
Rank in Neuquén
1st of 2

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

1.62.43.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.62.43.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Cutral CoPrzemyslArjona

In new street additions, Cutral Có fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Przemyśl built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Arjona fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. Looking at the full network, Przemyśl and Arjona both became progressively more disconnected, while Cutral Có became progressively more connected. Cutral Có and Przemyśl have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.