General Pico in context: Street-network sprawl trends

General Pico in context

11.522.5<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
11.522.5<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
General PicoLa Pampa (Region)Argentina (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with General Pico plotted against La Pampa and Argentina. While La Pampa and Argentina both followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, General Pico's new street additions followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, General Pico's incremental SNDi rose from 1.33 to 1.4 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, General Pico ranked 2nd out of 2 cities in La Pampa and 15th out of 77 in Argentina as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
1.4
Rank in Argentina
11th of 77
Rank in La Pampa
2nd of 2

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
1.24
Rank in Argentina
15th of 77
Rank in La Pampa
2nd of 2

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
General PicoDeoliHarbel City

In new street additions, General Pico fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Deoli built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Harbel City built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full network, General Pico became progressively more disconnected, while Deoli grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Harbel City grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. General Pico and Deoli have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.