The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Entre Ríos followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Entre Ríos, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Paraná, Concordia and Gualeguaychu. Out of the three cities, Concordia and Gualeguaychu do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Concordia peaked in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Gualeguaychu peaked in 1991-2005.

How do development practices in Entre Ríos fare in comparison to others in Argentina? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Entre Ríos was the 14th-most disconnected out of the 23 regions in Argentina. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Argentina, street construction in Entre Ríos has become more connected. Entre Ríos ranked 5th in 1975, 5th in 1976-1990, 10th in 1991-2005 and 14th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Entre Ríos is Concordia with an SNDi of 2.15, which is well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Concepción del Uruguay with an SNDi of 1.22, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Concepción del Uruguay, Concordia

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Entre Ríos rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Entre Ríos, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Paraná, Concordia and Gualeguaychu. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Entre Ríos follow the same region trend.

To date, Entre Ríos is the 6th-most disconnected out of the 23 regions in Argentina. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Argentina, the street network in Entre Ríos has become more connected. Entre Ríos ranked 5th in 1975, 5th in 1976-1990, 6th in 1991-2005 and 6th in 2006-2020.