Campana in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Campana in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Campana plotted against Buenos Aires and Argentina. While Buenos Aires and Argentina both followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, Campana's new street additions followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Campana's incremental SNDi rose from 1.78 to 2.81 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Campana ranked 12th out of 18 cities in Buenos Aires and 30th out of 77 in Argentina as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.81
- Rank in Argentina
- 62nd of 77
- Rank in Buenos Aires
- 13th of 18
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 1.38
- Rank in Argentina
- 30th of 77
- Rank in Buenos Aires
- 12th of 18
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
In new street additions, Campana fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Danwar built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Pianguan fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Campana and Danwar both became progressively more disconnected, while Pianguan fluctuated in connectivity. Notably, Campana had a more sprawly network than Danwar in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.